Renaissance and Naturalism

Renaissance is:

  • Bridge between Middle Ages and Modern History;
  • Cultural movement, started in the 14th century in Italy and then spread on Europe, ending in 16th century(in some sources 17th);
  • French word meaning ‘rebirth

How it all started:

  • Firstly, Rennaissance stays on a concept of ‘humanism’, which has origins in Greek philosophy. Greek philosophy was passed on to the Roman Empire. Therefore, ideas of antique philosophers were considered most seriously in Italy
  • Secondly, Italy had become very wealthy by 14th centtury. Consequently, community of wealthy people increased and they started to invest more money on art and science.

That is why, it all started in Italy, in 14th century.

Briefly, what people did or accomplished during Renaissance:

  1. They rediscovered the concept of ‘humanism’. Humanism is when: human, his personality, his freedom and his creative activities, – were considered as the highest values
  2. Due to investments of many wealthy people – many institutes of science and art were opened, without being under control of church
  3. In the 15th century, Johannes Guttenberg introduced a mechanical type printing. Books started to be printed out in large quantities.
  4. Art:
    • people like Donatello, Botticelli, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo revolutionized the ways of painting and sculpturing (e.g. 1-dot and 2-dot perspective drawing techniques were invented)
    • Many developments were reached in architecture, music and other signs of culture
  5. Science:
    • people like: Galileo Galilei, Tycho Brahe, Johannes Kepler, – advanced the science a lot with their discoveries (e.g. telescope, laws of planetary motion).
    • Galileo Galilei, Copernicus, Francis Bacon and others developed and actively promoted a new method for making discoveries – ‘the scientific method‘. The scientific method focused on empirical evidence and mathematics (Aristotelian science, for example, did not)

Naturalism is…

… According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, it has no precise meaning and its definition is still an object of debates.

However, naturalists are famous for their following assertions:

  • The structure of the universe is fully governed by natural laws, not supernatural
  • All the changes that occur in the universe are results of natural rules, not supernatural

There are different branches of naturalism. The most remarkable one is a ‘methodological naturalism‘. It asserts:

Religious commitment of a scientist does not have any relevance in science.

Which means that it does not matter whether one follows any religion or not, one’s beliefs must not affect the scientific fact.

  • Interestingly, methodological naturalism has its roots in the works of Thales.
  • Evolved significantly during the Renaissance

 

For further study:

If you want to get more insight into the rennaissance or naturalism, I recommend you to visit websites, which I used to write this blog:

 

Last but not least, I kindly recommend you to watch at least one of the following short videos from youtube.com, which you will enjoy:

13 thoughts on “Renaissance and Naturalism

  1. Wow! This is starting point of ‘Real science’. Honestly, I was boring with phylosophical stuff, even though that was significantly related to modern science. I hope that we can study about history more related to contemporary science after the renaissance.

    Like

  2. Your post was very helpful for me to find out that Renaissance period was when the empiricism, more commonly known as the “Scientific method” today, kicked off in the community of scientists.

    You mentioned that Italy became wealthy, which allowed people to spend more money on art and science, and also build institutions to support these disciplines. I was wondering how exactly Italy became wealthy. What were the contributing factors which allowed Renaissance period Italy to prosper?

    Also if naturalism states that everything is fully governed by natural laws and refutes the supernatural force, yet also states that religious commitment of a scientists does not have any relevance in science, then how do you personally feel about some religious biologists who refuse to study Darwinism evolution because it goes against the principle of fundamentalism? I’m aware that in the 1930s, some school teachers refused to teach Darwin’s theory of evolution due to religious reasons. In the perspective of naturalists, would the teachers not considered as the real scientists then?

    Like

    • Thank you for your interest, yooniquejimin. As far as I know, city-states were developing in Italy (like Florence and Venice). Maybe it had lead to increase in number of artists, artisans, merchants and bankers, – who could prosper without having relations with feudalism.
      About religious biologists and teachers: beliefs of people should not affect the common truth. Because world that is built on universal truth is more stable than the world built on beliefs, which may differ from person to person. Another question is: was the Darwin theory a scientific fact in 1930s ? Wikipedia says that it was accepted only in 1950s when significant body of evidences was gathered. But, anyway, appealing to religion contradicts methods of naturalism and modern science, that is why I think that those religious biologists and teachers were not very competent.

      Like

  3. I didn’y actually know about naturallism before reading your posting. But now, I can little understand what naturallists want to say. “The structure of the universe is fully governed by natural laws, not supernatural”. I think this statement is also very important to scientists, and engineers like me. We want to find the natural laws and use it in very useful and innovative way. In this point of view, I think naturalism is a lot fancy and modern thinking method.

    Like

  4. In this semester, I also studied Renaissance about music part. However, with your posting, I can get further informations about other part of Renaissance. In addition, with definition of naturalism, the structure and all the changes in the universe are fully governed by natural laws, not supernatural, this concept is very different with myth which were coverd 2weeks ago. Therefore, I can get human’s thought about nature has been changed a lot in this period.

    Like

  5. I didn’t know that Humanism was developed at Renaissance. It was surpring that not only science or art, but also philosophy was growing at the same period. Renaissance was truly amazing period of human mind and knowledge.
    And in the video(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMf8hFBJylA), I can know many things about Leonardo da Vinci. I knew that he was genius but after I watch that I think he was more genius than I thought.

    Like

  6. A huge part of the Renaissance was also the constant clash between the Church and the leaders in Renaissance, like the imprisonment of Galileo.

    Leonardo da Vinci was also ambidextrous, a master swordsman and a master musician. It might not be directly related but i am such a huge fan of Leonardo da Vinci that i couldn’t resist mentioning it. 😛

    Liked by 1 person

  7. You listed many Renaissance activists such as Donatello, Botticelli, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo for art, Galileo Galilei, Tycho Brahe, Johannes Kepler for science. But what about Naturalism? Isn’t there any famous naturalists or Naturalism activists?

    Like

  8. Actually, Renaissance is also part of Middle Age. To be exact, Renaissance is ‘the latter part of Middle Age’ or ‘glory days of Middle Age’.
    Renaissance is tendency that resist of Gothic style, which is widely spread in Europe that time. Especially, Italian wanted return to Ancient Rome. Since Italian accumulated lots of wealth from the Mediterranean commerce, the arts and literacy are highly improved. Although Italian Renaissance was fell by the Ottoman Empire and colonial trades, Renaissance spread to Europe widely.

    Like

  9. Thanks for your posting! I just knew that Renaissance is age of arts. It is interesting that wealthy people led Renaissance. Some facts indicate that Renaissance emphasis on human. For example, arts and science passed the bound or religion, starting humanism. Thanks to your posting, I know correct and new information about Renaissance. But I need to spend more time studying Naturalism. I want more information about methodological naturalism.

    Like

  10. I think there are various reasons for the start of Renaissance, for example, the Crusades, the introduction of gun powder or development of printing. Humanism was obviously the big change on thoughts of educated people and it motivated people to focus on culture and science not only for religious reasons. In addition, the authority of church has weakened after Crusades, and the power and knowledge was given to the common people by new technology and inventions. In my opinion, these differences made the results of science, art and various fields, even though they are not related to god or stand against religion, survived until now.

    Like

  11. Pingback: Best 20 Renaissance Naturalism - Mitadoor Đồng Nai

  12. Pingback: Best 16 Naturalism In The Renaissance - Mitadoor Đồng Nai

Leave a comment